Thursday, September 13, 2007

Beginnings

I have been in Argentina for two weeks now. For my first week, I was in Buenos Aires for an orientation with the other Young Adult Global Mission folks who will also be spending a year in a Lutheran church placement in Argentina or Uruguay. We were housed at the Lutheran seminary in Buenos Aires, ISEDET, and spent the week visiting various Lutheran organizations and other groups that are working to promote the peace and justice.
One of the groups that we visited during our orientation was Las Madres de la Plaza de Mayo. We went to the mothers´ weekly Thursday march in La Plaza de Mayo, where they still ask the government, 30 years later, where their children are today. The mothers began gathering around the plaza when the government was disappearing their children during the Dirty War in the late 1970s. These sons and daughters were mostly in their teens, twenties, and thirties, and were often youth that had a new vision for their country, a vision that differed from the current social order of that time. Many of the groups of youth that were targeted were church groups.
After witnessing a march around the plaza, we had the opportunity to meet with some of the mothers and hear their own personal stories. They spoke about the power and importance of names and telling stories to keep the memory of what happened alive. 30,000 people disappeared in that time! Just as we say for the Holocaust, ¨Never Forget¨, it is important that this struggle stay alive – that the government not only acknowledge what it did, but tell the families of the disappeared where their children are, and who killed them. To this day, we still do not know where the bodies are, nor do we know who the potential killers are. Yet, places have been discovered to be much like the concentration camps that one would find in Europe.
It is also important for the citizens of the U.S to be aware of the ways in which our government played a role in the Dirty War. Much of the problems at the time were around issues of money and trade, and the U.S. government wanted to keep Argentina in its control. At that time, the U.S. had created a military base, known as the School of the Americas, now currently known as WHINSEC (Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation), to train Latin Americans techniques of torture and other ways to dehumanize the people of Latin America who were fighting for their human rights and dignity.
As you can imagine, these women had powerful stories to tell and to this day understand what their children were fighting for – a just world. The mothers are involved in current projects of advocacy that they believe their children would have been rallying and organizing for today. They held a banner that read, ¨¡Distribucion de la Riqueza Ya!¨ (Distribution of the Wealth Now!).
This past week, I moved to Obera, Argentina, which is the northeastern province of Argentina. It sits on the border of Brazil and Paraguay. I will be working with IELU (United Evangelical Lutheran Church)´s Project for Human Promotion and Sustainable Development and with the congregation ¨Dios Es Amor,¨ a church community located in the rural outskirts of Obera. So far I have been spending my time with my facilitators, Maria Elena Parras and Pastor Mariela Pereyra. I have been accompanying them in their daily work, further acquainting myself with the projects and communities that I will be involved with this year.
For me, the highlight of my week was when Tito, one of the small farmers that is involved with the Project for Human Promotion and Sustainable Development, invited me to join him on a ride out to his farm to check on the Yerba mate (Argentina´s tea), tea, lemons, and bananas growing on his farm. We took an hour ride out through the rolling hills of the red earth of the province of Misiones. I had a chance to hear more about Tito´s life story and the life of a small farmer in Misiones. I enjoyed the visit to the farm, where we checked on his new Yerba, which unfortunately is not growing well due to the lack of rain these last few months, and harvested some of the lemons from his trees.
What strikes me right now is the number of pine tress that are growing in the province. In the 70s, the government attempted to help the region by distributing pine trees as a raw material for the area, for paper, firewood and furniture. However, the pine tree is not a native plant, and takes too much water from the ground. It is both a mystery to me and the farmers as to why the government would choose to plant pine over a native plant to the area. This is one of the areas that small farmers are working on – asking the government for native trees instead of pine trees. Yet, the government seems to be taking its time in listening to the farmers´ request. I am just beginning to understand the struggle of farming out here in Misiones, and I know that I will have more to say about it in the future.

5 comments:

shauna said...

Kim - fascinating discoveries already! I am sure you'll continue to learn more and more while you're there, and I'm eager to hear everything - thanks so much for sharing. I wonder if the pine trees began with the thought that they could 'produce value' in the form of paper and timber, as opposed to the native species which might not have the same capability to convert. It wouldn't surprise me if the government was thinking in pure economic terms versus the intertwining of economic, environmental and social ... let us know when you find out more!

Lee Rials said...

I commend your good work, but wonder why you include such false statements as those referring to the School of the Americas. I work at the Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation, which replaced the school almost seven years ago as a result of a law signed by Pres. Clinton, but I take offense when people imply that the school taught illegal, immoral or unethical things. There is no evidence of that, and the implication is a moral libel of the people who worked there. If you like, I can put you in touch with an Evangelical Lutheran chaplain who was once the chaplain of the SOA. He can tell you exactly what was done there; I don't think he would have tolerated the kind of acts that you allege. My email is lee.rials@us.army.mil, if you want to study this (although it sounds as if your next few months are filled already).

Lee Rials said...

Josh, I hope you are still there. The allegations you mention are baseless, from people who try to make the impossible construct that some attendance at the school--no matter what course or how long--is 'proof' that the school contributed to bad acts. Take a look at the courses offered and see what you object to. Better yet, walk in our door any workday, sit in some classes, talk with some students and faculty, and review the instructional materials. We are the most accessible facility in all of DoD. Congress changed the name in law to continue the security cooperation represented by the school, an opportunity lost if the school had been simply closed. And our real requirement is to teach what is moral, legal, and ethical. If some students later behave badly, that behavior will have come from some other influence, not the institute.

Chris said...

Josh, why mess with this guy? He isn't going to answer your questions with anything other than prescribed responses. He certainly won't admit to even the possibility of wrong doing. He is probably another Seth.

Lee, let just borrow your argument tactic. While you allege that the bad behavior of your graduates "will have to come from some other influence, not the institute.", you actually offer no 'proof' of this. I wonder, how ethical is it to train a man to kill another? I'd better leave this question to the US DoD. As I remember they are the experts on ethics...

http://www.gallerym.com/images/work/big/pulitzer_nick_ut_vietnam_napalm_kim_phuc_6872_L.jpg

Chris said...

Leif,

The allegations you mention about Lee are baseless, from people who try to make the impossible construct that some amount of poopy on the butt -- no matter the amount or consistency -- is 'proof' that lee is a poopy-butt. Take a look at his butt and see what you object to. Better yet, stick your hand down the back of his pants any workday, feel for poopy, and review his stool samples. Lee's pants are the most acessible in all of the DoD. Congress will even tell you of the pristine conditions of Lee's butt, as he served as a page for many republican senators. Lee's real requirement is to teach us that war is peace and that love is hate. If Lee's butt somehow becomes poopy on a later date, that poopy will have come from some other butt, not Lee's.